Jeffry Stetson wrote:
Dow Corning 340 is apparently an acceptable substitute. One probably shouldn't stray too far from the original spec Rotax stuff. The heat conduction via the paste is part of the overall engineering: too much has a potential of being just as bad as too little.
That's an interesting point, although I have to wonder how much of an impact it has. In my cabinet of random thermal pastes, I found some $$$ silver-based silicone heat transfer paste, and it's about 6-7x more performant than the Wecker stuff.
Thermal paste makes a big difference, in terms of backing off a cliff, but going from 0.8W/m-K to 5W/m-K is unlikely to have as much an impact as simply having a thermal paste at all (vs. bare metal). And this coupled with the fact that our engines are not really temperature stabilized, so the spark plug could just as easily be heat sunk to 50C metal as 150C metal. That range is far wider than what the paste can do.
In general, I'm really curious why Rotax chose this route. It seems an incremental solution, but I suppose that if you're already running the coolest sparkplugs with the smallest gap there's really not a lot more of dials you can twist and knobs you can pull to further reduce heat. But if that's the case, then the better pastes ought to give improved results.