Ken Ryan wrote:
Seems to me that the engine, prop AND airframe are a system. They are giving you a guideline. Use that guideline to fine tune for your specific system.
Hi Ken,
I agree to some degree however no such reason was given AND I would expect each prop model to have an optimum speed range, irrespective of airframe.
Further their only unsatisfactory response (to me) were;
# 5000 rpm(they talk in engine rpm for Rotax applications) is what most are using. Can't except this without some reason.
# Rotax specified - Hard to believe, as Rotax consistently recomend min 5200 rpm for all "load" situations. Yes I know that there are lower speed rpms allowable.
While it is likly that the pilot will optimise the prop for a given airframe it would be very nice to have some empirical data to start with ie not have to "reinvent the wheel".